TVS logo

#4 Why has trust in corporate(s) dropped off?

Thanks for all your votes.

Let’s give Cadbury a chance shall we – we thought we’d give Cadbury the right of reply so we will be e-mailing this link to them – specifically the Marketing Director of Australia & NZ.

It seems that the first majority of us think that Cadbury are up to some sort of mischief. Over 90% of voters think that Cadbury are sneaking in a way to make more money and getting it under the radar.

Consumer trust in corporate(s) plummeted in the 90’s at the same time as corporate spending on ‘being good citizens ’ went exponential – for the first time marketing had truly failed.

In judging Cadbury – We are being like consumers – viewing corporate(s) as self serving and evil:

  • Are you evil?
  • Is your company evil?

We suspect you would say no – and yet when looking at another organisation we seem to judge them differently to ourselves. Why is this – it’s very important – it undermines the importance of Referral Marketing of course but you’d guessed that already. When advertising first started – advertisers were genuinely viewed as great citizens – allowing consumers to navigate away from ‘rip-off’ merchants to companies who were successful enough to advertise. (Source Permission Marketing – Seth Godin). It was P&G’s mastery of this evolving medium in the 40’s that gave birth to the current model as we know it.

The Yankelovich report of 2006 shows that as corporate spending on being ‘seen to be good’ went exponential so too:

  • Consumer trust in corporate (s) plummeted to an all time low at the same time as advertising spend on ‘being good’ went exponential
  • In fact the University of Chicago showed that we trusted religions, governments – in fact everyone less.
  • In other words we didn’t believe the million dollars in advertising telling us how nice corporate(s) were.

Marketing – for the first time in history had truly failed. We, the marketing community could not persuade people anymore. The reason? Well the one cited in the Yankelovich report is that essentially we spent more time on interactive media than broadcast media so messages didn’t get through. That explanation just seems too simple, too superficial and ultimately it leaves us (marketers) feeling powerless – doesn’t it?

Why has trust in corporate(s) dropped off – have marketers failed or are corporate(s) more evil?

What has changed, really, really, really? Take out the it’s harder to reach people argument – Let’s pose another hypothesis – has trust dropped off because

corporates are inherently less trustworthy? Less responsive? Less caring? So in fact all the spending in the world could not mask the ‘evil corporate’ because their day to day behavior was at odds with their claimed values.

That argument doesn’t work either. The motive of most companies has not changed in this century or the last – to make money for their shareholders. Of course some companies will take more risks than others and some are more greedy than others – but really nothing has changed.

So what might it be?:

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

It will be interesting to find out where we sit on this – and for you to reflect on the importance of Referrals more than ever. At the risk of ‘jumping the square’ – we’d like to get a broader feel on this for the community – so please forward it to a friend who might benefit from the answer.

Many thanks

The Anglo-Dutch TVS

Best

Jake & Cornelis

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

3 Comments

    I suspect there will be a widely varying range of votes as so many of these factors have contributed to the erosion of trust between brands/coproates and their consumers – its probably impossible to pin point one or even a few reasons. If we assume the basis of intelligent WOM can be concentrated down to an essence of “simple, relevant and meaningful conversations between people” can then the issue of corporates having lost the trust factor be a function of the fact they have simply stopped having those conversations with consumers, breeding suspicion and a sesne of aloofness.
    Hence why people are now responding to WOM…they are being engaged agin and enjoying less degrees of separation from themselves and the product, brand, company because of the attributes of the WOM medium ???

  • I have voted above for Companies no longer nurturing real relationships. Let me explain why.

    In the last decade the pressure on all publicly listed companies to deliver profit growth every quarter has reached stupid levels. Senior executive bonuses are driven by them, and share price health is driven by them.

    Such a strong focus on quarterly growth (ideally through revenue growth, but if not then through cost management)means companies, and their brands are making bad long term decisions, all to deliver results today.

    Its a pressure that doesn’t exist for the Whittakers of this world – Thank God.

    The only way this behaviour can stop? Through us as consumers making stands that even these manage for today execs will understand!

  • Thanks so much for the comments. Richard is saying that WOM is working precisely because companies are not wanting to connect and from what JR is saying a lot of that is to do with being too busy making money.

    Let’s see how this plays out with Cadbury shall we? We can test the hypothesis.
    Jake &Corn

Leave a Reply